😧” How on earth did he say that on a live interview” 🙆🏼‍♂️ 😢” The Scottish premiership is gone” Danny Rohl post match interview makes the journalist mute his mic 🎤

😧 “How on earth did he say that on a live interview?” 🙆🏼‍♂️
😢 “The Scottish Premiership is gone”
Danny Röhl post-match interview makes the journalist cut his mic 🎤

Danny Röhl has landed himself at the centre of a major storm after an explosive post-match interview in which he openly slammed the referee over Rangers’ disallowed goal — comments that many believe crossed the line on live television.

What began as a standard post-match discussion quickly turned uncomfortable when Röhl questioned the officiating, insisting that Rangers were robbed by the referee’s decision to rule out a goal. In a moment that stunned viewers, Röhl boldly claimed the scoreline “should have been 1–4 in favour of Rangers”, a statement that immediately changed the tone of the interview.

The journalist, visibly caught off guard, attempted to steer the conversation away, but Röhl pressed on, criticising the decision and suggesting it had a decisive impact on the game. Within moments, the interview was abruptly cut short, with reports indicating the journalist muted his microphone to prevent the situation from escalating further on air.

Backlash followed almost instantly. Fans and pundits accused Röhl of showing a lack of sportsmanship, arguing that post-match emotions should never justify publicly attacking match officials. The controversy deepened when alleged leaked comments surfaced online after the interview ended, despite the original clip being deleted.

Critics were quick to respond, with one former player stating:

> “This is no longer analysis. This is disrespect — to the referee, to the opposition, and to the league.”

While some supporters praised Röhl for “speaking the truth,” others believe his words risk undermining the credibility of the Scottish Premiership and putting unnecessary pressure on referees.

With calls growing for the Scottish FA to review the incident, attention now turns to whether Röhl will issue an apology or stand by his claim that Rangers should have walked away 4–1 winners.

One interview. One disallowed goal. And a controversy that refuses to die.